After viewing the presentations of all the
groups the conclusion I have drawn is that one should not restrict themselves
to a single strategy but should apply all of them from time to time in their
course where appropriate.
All the teaching strategies hold their own
ground with their own strengths and weaknesses.
Interactive
lecturing corresponds to the level 3 teacher as not only are the students told
at the start of the lecture what they are supposed to learn but are also kept engaged
and active in a number of different ways.
Interactive
lecturing provides high retention rates through student involvement and can also
incorporate methods such as Think-Pair-Share which is also a method of
Collaborative Learning. Basically, all these teaching strategies are
interlinked with each other. The main disadvantage of Interactive Lecturing
that I find is that it requires a lot of time and is hence not suitable for
long structured courses. In contrast, Direct Instruction ensures no loss of
time. However, Directional Learning does not present the students with the opportunity
to analyse and evaluate. In Directional Learning only some students use their
higher cognitive processes while others become passive learners. It falls into
Bloom’s categories of ‘remembering’ ‘understanding’ and ‘applying’, but fails
to reach the higher categories. However if DI is combined with other teaching
strategies such as PBL it is possible to achieve the higher three levels of
analysis, synthesis and evaluation in the Bloom’s Taxonomy. In other words, if
students are given clear instructions about what to do and how to go about
solving problems by applying the knowledge they have gained, the students will
be able to analyse and evaluate the knowledge and will be able to apply it to
unfamiliar situations presented to them in Problem Based Learning.
Also, what
I feel is that every student should know how to work in a teambuilding skills
are essential for the students’ practical lives. This is why I feel that
teachers should try to incorporate Collaborative learning in their scheme of
work as it nurtures the students social and communication skills.
In teaching
my courses of Religious Studies although I use Interactive lecturing as my main
teaching strategy, I do incorporate Problem Based Learning from time to time as
it allows me to assess whether my students can apply the knowledge gained to
other situations. I also try to use Collaborative lecturing where possible and
give the students projects to do as a team, for example to create a
presentation together.
Hi Annie, I would disagree that Interactive Lecturing is not suitable for long structured courses as this depends on how far 'off topic' the discussions are allowed to range. If managed well in a 'flipped classroom' kind of way it would work well. However, I do agree that all strategies are useful and under certain conditions some are more useful than others. Even if only to spice up our own teaching!!
ReplyDelete